Quantum computing startup says it will leapfrog everybody
Bias ratings based on AllSides + Ad Fontes Media. Agreement % = sources covering this story. Always read multiple sources and think critically.
Those details about how it was going to get there were left for last Wednesday, when QuEra announced its roadmap.
But the announcement only accentuated the gap: There will be no new hardware releases between now and the useful machine, and QuEra is promising to deliver an even more powerful machine just one year later. “The company made a strategic decision not to sell NISQ [noisy intermediate scale quantum] systems anymore,” QuEra’s Yuval Borger told Ars. The two systems it had previously made available have similar capabilities, with about 250 hardware qubits and an appreciable error rate—enough to test some error correction codes, but not sufficient for using logical qubits in applications.
QuEra’s machines operate using neutral atoms that are held in a grid by lasers, so raising the qubit count is largely a matter of boosting the laser capacity. And the two academic labs that launched QuEra and licensed IP to it have already demonstrated a 3,000-qubit system. Scaling that will be a challenge, but there’s an obvious route to it.
The labs have also demonstrated the ability to replace atoms lost during operations, an ability that’s critical to keeping these machines running. The bigger challenge QuEra faces will be that these future machines require getting the error rates of the hardware qubits down dramatically. As a rough approximation, the error rates of logical qubits depend on a combination of how many hardware qubits are used to create the logical ones, and the error rate of the hardware qubits.
If you get the hardware error rate down, you can get similar error correction performance out of a logical qubit built with fewer hardware ones. (Some of the more efficient error correction schemes use fewer hardware qubits, but there are limits to how far this can be pushed.) In its 2028 machine, QuEra will be using an error correction code that requires 40 hardware qubits for each logical qubit. One year later, it intends to cut the hardware qubits per logical qubit to 20.
Cutting it to that number will require the hardware error rate to go down just to keep the same level of performance, except QuEra is also promising dramatically better performance, which means the hardware error rate will drop even further. It’s unclear where that sort of drop is going to come from, especially given it’s only expected to take one year. When we asked QuEra about the biggest challenges remaining, the error rate wasn’t mentioned specifically.
“A lot of the challenges between now and a production system on the cloud are classical challenges, not quantum challenges: control electronics, real-time quantum error correction, building compilers that allow users to easily tap into the power of the system,” Borger told Ars. Although the company has listed the current error rates for its hardware (which are very good, but not presently good enough for this), it is not specifying the level of performance that will be needed to achieve its planned goals. The announcement is potentially exciting, but it’s difficult to evaluate how seriously to take QuEra’s plans.
Think About This
What questions does this story raise for you? Talk with your family: Why does this news matter? Who is affected? What might happen next? Is there anything you can do?
- Ask your child: “What do you think scientists discovered about quantum computing? What part surprised you most?”
- Explore together: Search for “quantum computing” on NASA Kids’ Club, DK Find Out, or National Geographic Kids for more kid-friendly facts.
- Critical thinking: Science findings can change as more research is done. Ask: “How would scientists test this? What would prove them wrong?”
KiddieDaily is built for families — balanced sources, no agenda, no ads. Always read the original source and think for yourself.
🔍 Want to verify this story? Check it on Google Fact Check Explorer →
More stories: Kid News · Archive · Fact Check