120mph serves but movement a struggle - how did Williams' return go?
Bias ratings based on AllSides + Ad Fontes Media. Agreement % = sources covering this story. Always read multiple sources and think critically.
ByAmy Lofthouse, BBC Sport senior journalist at Wimbledon and Emily Salley, BBC Sport journalist at WimbledonPublished4 hours agoSerena Williams walked out onto Wimbledon's Centre Court, closed her eyes, took a deep breath and smiled at the ovation that greeted her.
Williams has consistently said she has nothing left to prove as she resumes the tennis career from which she evolved away in 2022. But no-one was sure what to expect on Tuesday evening when she faced Australia's Maya Joint in what was the 44-year-old's first singles match in four years. There would have been a moment of relief for Williams when she won her first point at SW19 for 1,462 days - a forced error from Joint in response to a huge return of serve from the American.
The match ended in a 6-3 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 win for Joint, who started strongly, weathered a second-set dip, and regrouped impressively from a break down in the third. The competitive nature that propelled Williams to 23 Grand Slam titles means she will not be satisfied with the outcome. She has often said she hates losing more than she loves winning.
And this was not vintage Williams. She played better as the match went on before fading in the third set. There were, however, glimpses of the player that dominated the WTA Tour for over two decades.
"I was a bit cynical and very curious about what was going to happen in this match," former Wimbledon champion Pat Cash said on BBC Radio 5 Live. "What we saw is two people playing very good tennis and Maya being able to handle the pace of Serena.
Think About This
What questions does this story raise for you? Talk with your family: Why does this news matter? Who is affected? What might happen next? Is there anything you can do?
- Ask your child: “Why do you think people care about 120mph serves? How might this affect families like ours?”
- Compare sources: The bias rating above shows how this outlet leans. Try finding one more source that covers the same story. Do they agree? What’s different?
- Media literacy: Ask: “What facts does this story give us? What opinions does it include? Who is speaking, and why might they say this?”
KiddieDaily is built for families — balanced sources, no agenda, no ads. Always read the original source and think for yourself.
🔍 Want to verify this story? Check it on Google Fact Check Explorer →
More stories: Kid News · Archive · Fact Check